
Sponsor: Rep. Waxman, Henry A. (Energy and Commerce Committee)
Date: June 26, 2009
111th Congress, 1st Session
FLOOR SITUATION
On June 26, 2009, the House will consider H.R. 2425, the American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES), sponsored by Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Ed Markey (D-MA). The rule, H.Res. 587, self-executes the Manager's Amendment, and makes in order one Republican amendment. There will be three hours of debate on the bill, and 30 minutes of debate on the amendment.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Over 1,200 pages long, H.R. 2454 contains four sections outlining mandates for renewable energy, mandates for energy efficiency, a cap-and-tax proposal, and a "transitioning" section focused on forestalling expected job loss.
- Higher Energy Prices: The bill imposes a national cap-and-tax regime that ultimately every consumer in the U.S. would pay for. Independent researchers, CBO, and the President all agree that this cost will be passed to consumers. Furthermore, almost every other provision in the bill either increases the cost of energy directly or tried to keep it from increasing too much-such as a new federal renewable electricity standard that would likely cause electricity prices to spike.
- Fewer Jobs: The bill does little to address the enormous loss of jobs that would ensue when U.S. industries absorb the cost of the cap-and-tax plan and other provisions, likely sending millions of American jobs overseas. There is little debate that a national energy tax would outsource millions of manufacturing jobs to countries such as China and India. According to the independent Charles River Associates International, H.R. 2454 would result in a "net reduction in U.S. employment of 2.3 million to 2.7 million jobs each year of the policy through 2030," even after the creation of new green jobs.
- More Government Intrusion: The bill creates a host of new federal mandates on everything from outdoor light bulbs and table lamps to water dispensers, commercial hot food cabinets, and Jacuzzis. The bill would also increase the demand for electricity (to fuel plug-in vehicles via new hybrid incentives) at the same time as the other portions of the bill cause consumer electricity costs to spike.
Although the bill includes "free" allowances for some sectors, economists agree that even if 100 percent of the industry's emissions were initially covered by free allocations, the bill's declining carbon cap will force higher and higher costs onto the American public. According to the Heritage Foundation, by 2035 this legislation would:
-
Reduce aggregate gross GDP by $9.4 trillion;
-
Raise electricity rates 90 percent;
-
Raise gasoline prices by 58 percent;
-
Raise residential natural gas prices by 55 percent; and
- Increase inflation-adjusted federal debt by 26 percent, or $28,728 additional federal debt per person, again after adjusting for inflation.
Furthermore, a recent poll shows that 78 percent of individuals questioned said that a $50 increase in monthly utility bills would be a hardship. 58 percent of respondents say that they are unwilling to pay any more than they currently pay for electricity to combat climate change. To that end, one-half of those polled oppose enacting a carbon tax to fund energy research (up from 31 percent in 2007).
Groups Opposing:
60 Plus Association • Alliance for Worker Freedom • American Civil Rights Union • American Conservative Union (ACU)
American Farm Bureau Federation • American Meat Institute • American Petroleum Institute • American for Limited Government
American Shareholders Association • Americans for Prosperity (AFP) • Americans for Tax Reform (ATR)
Association of Builders and Contractors (ABC) • Citizens Against Government Waste • Citizens for Responsible Government
Club for Growth • Coalition for Affordable American Energy (CAAE) • Concerned Women for America (CWA)
Congress of Racial Equality (CORE) • Eagle Forum • FRCAction • FreedomWorks • Focus on the Family • Hispanic Leadership Fund
Independent Electrical Contractors, Inc • Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) • Institute for Liberty
Let Freedom Ring • National Association of Convenience Stores (NACS) • National Association of Manufacturers (NAM)
National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors • National Cattleman Beef Association • National Chicken Council
National Cotton Council • National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) • National Grain and Feed Association
National Mining Association (NMA) • National Petrochemical & Refiners Association • National Taxpayers Union
National Turkey Federation • Republican Jewish Coalition • U.S. Chamber of Commerce
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .